
Investors went on a wild ride last week, briefly wiping out $2 trillion in stock value, over fears that AI agents from companies like Anthropic and OpenAI could steal business from established software vendors — but the market seems to have overreacted.
However, it's improbable that most Fortune 500 companies will want to develop and maintain their own bespoke (custom-made) software for tasks like customer relationship management or human resources. Even with AI-powered automation, managing enterprise resource planning (ERP) software can divert resources and engineering talent, according to experts. This suggests demand for SaaS companies' core offerings will persist.
There's more reason for concern regarding AI agents from foundation model makers potentially dominating the AI agent market. Companies like Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google could control the agent orchestration platforms, which are the frameworks for building and managing complex workflows. OpenAI is attempting to do this with its new agentic AI platform for enterprises called Frontier.
Even if foundation model companies gain ground, it doesn't spell complete doom for SaaS. Anthropic’s Claude Cowork, for instance, utilizes SaaS software as a tool to accomplish tasks. This means that while some customers might prefer Claude Cowork over upgrading to offerings like Salesforce’s Agentforce or Microsoft’s 365 Copilot, the underlying SaaS infrastructure remains relevant.
SaaS vendors are also adapting their business models to address the potential decline in seat license sales. Salesforce is pioneering "Agentic Enterprise License Agreements" (AELA), offering fixed-price access to Agentforce. ServiceNow is shifting to consumption-based and value-based pricing models, while Microsoft is incorporating consumption-based pricing into its Copilot Studio product. These changes could impact SaaS companies' growth and margins, as they may not benefit as much from unused licenses.
More insights on trending topics and technology







